Skip to main content
Settings
Color Mode
Theme Skin
Background

Appearance preferences are saved in this browser only.

Environment
Current Environment Production

Built with JEKYLL_ENV=production. Changes require deployment.

Quick Links
Theme & Build
Jekyll v3.10.0
Last Build Jul 31, 08:24
Page Info
Layout article
Collection posts
Path _posts/history-politics/2009-06-28-honduran-coup-2009.md
URL /news/history-politics/honduran-coup-2009/
Date 2009-06-28
Source Code

Set repository: USER/REPO in your _config.yml to enable source-code shortcuts.

Table of Contents

2009 Honduran Coup d'État

Key figures: Manuel Zelaya (deposed President of Honduras), Roberto Micheletti (President of the National Congress, installed as de facto President), Óscar Arias (President of Costa Rica, accord mediator), Porfirio “Pepe” Lobo (President-elect, November 2009 election)

Background

Manuel Zelaya, a rancher and timber magnate from the Olancho department, won the 2005 Honduran presidential election as the Liberal Party candidate on a centrist platform. During his term, he made a marked populist turn: he raised the minimum wage by 60% in January 2009, joined the Venezuelan-led ALBA (Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America) in August 2008, and cultivated a close relationship with Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, who supplied Honduras with subsidized fuel through the PetroCaribe agreement. This ideological shift alienated the country’s business community, the Catholic hierarchy, and eventually much of his own Liberal Party establishment.

The constitutional flashpoint arrived in spring 2009 when Zelaya announced plans to hold a fourth ballot box (cuarta urna) on June 28, 2009 — the day of regularly scheduled municipal pre-registration votes — asking citizens whether they supported convening a national constituent assembly to draft a new constitution. Critics charged that a new constitution could remove term-limit provisions and allow Zelaya to seek re-election, although he insisted the matter would be decided by a future elected assembly, not by him. Honduras’s Supreme Court, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, and the National Congress, controlled by Zelaya’s opponents, all declared the planned plebiscite illegal. When Zelaya ordered the armed forces to distribute the ballots, military chief General Romeo Vásquez Velásquez refused; Zelaya dismissed him on June 24, a move the Supreme Court immediately declared unlawful. By June 27, Congress had begun drafting a decree to remove Zelaya from office.

Summary

On the morning of June 28, 2009, Honduran Army soldiers stormed the presidential residence in Tegucigalpa, detained President Manuel Zelaya, and flew him out of the country to San José, Costa Rica, still in his pajamas. The military acted hours before a nonbinding referendum Zelaya was pushing to hold on convening a constitutional assembly, a vote the Supreme Court and Congress had declared illegal. Later that day, the National Congress voted to accept a disputed resignation letter attributed to Zelaya and appointed Roberto Micheletti, until then president of the Congress, as his constitutional successor to complete the presidential term through January 27, 2010. Zelaya and most of the international community rejected the process as a military coup rather than a legal succession.

The Organization of American States (OAS) condemned the removal of Zelaya and, at an emergency session on July 4–5, 2009, voted 33–0 (with Honduras abstaining) to suspend Honduras’s membership under Article 21 of the Inter-American Democratic Charter — the first suspension of a member state ever invoked under that Charter. The United Nations General Assembly and the European Union likewise condemned the ouster. Costa Rican President Óscar Arias mediated talks between Zelaya’s and Micheletti’s representatives, producing the Tegucigalpa–San José Accord, signed October 30, 2009, which called for a “unity and reconciliation” government, a truth commission, amnesty for coup-related political offenses, and congressional consideration of Zelaya’s restoration. The accord’s implementation collapsed after Micheletti announced on November 5–6 he would form a new cabinet without waiting for a congressional vote on Zelaya’s reinstatement.

On September 21, 2009, Zelaya returned clandestinely to Honduras, traveling overland for roughly fifteen hours to evade checkpoints, and took refuge inside the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa, where he remained for months under a Micheletti-imposed state of emergency and curfew. Honduras proceeded with previously scheduled general elections on November 29, 2009; Porfirio Lobo of the National Party won with about 56% of the vote against Elvin Santos, in a contest recognized by the United States but not by several Latin American governments, which continued to view the post-coup government as illegitimate. Zelaya left the Brazilian embassy for exile in the Dominican Republic on January 27, 2010, the day Lobo was inaugurated.

Key Timeline

Date Event
June 24, 2009 Zelaya dismisses military chief Vásquez; Supreme Court rules dismissal illegal
June 28, 2009 (03:00–05:30) Army soldiers detain Zelaya at the presidential residence and fly him to Costa Rica
June 28, 2009 (afternoon) Congress votes to install Micheletti as interim president; claims Zelaya submitted resignation letter
July 4–5, 2009 OAS emergency session votes 33–0 to suspend Honduras — first such suspension in OAS history
July 5, 2009 Zelaya attempts to land at Tegucigalpa airport in a chartered plane; military vehicles block the runway; one protester killed in clashes
October 30, 2009 Tegucigalpa–San José Accord signed; calls for unity government and Zelaya’s reinstatement via Congress
November 5–6, 2009 Micheletti announces new cabinet without waiting for congressional vote on Zelaya, effectively killing the accord
November 29, 2009 General elections proceed; Porfirio Lobo wins with ~56% of the vote
January 27, 2010 Lobo inaugurated; Zelaya departs Brazilian embassy for exile

International Reaction

The crisis fractured hemispheric unity in complex ways. The United States, under President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, initially joined the near-universal condemnation, calling Zelaya’s ouster a “coup” and suspending some military aid to Honduras. U.S. Ambassador Hugo Llorens filed internal cables (later published by WikiLeaks) explicitly calling the removal an illegal military coup. However, the U.S. declined to invoke additional sanctions, and by November 2009 it recognized the Lobo election — a stance that drew criticism from Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Brazil, which all maintained that the coup government remained illegitimate regardless of the election. The G20 Pittsburgh Summit (September 2009), where Lobo’s government was not represented, took no formal position on the crisis, reflecting broader tensions over sovereignty versus democratic accountability that also shaped debates around the Iran’s Green Movement protests the same year.

Aftermath

Porfirio Lobo’s administration worked to restore Honduras to inter-American bodies: the OAS reinstated Honduras on June 1, 2011, after Zelaya was permitted to return from exile. Zelaya went on to found the Libertad y Refundación (LIBRE) party, which ran his wife Xiomara Castro as a presidential candidate in 2013 and 2017; Castro ultimately won the 2021 presidential election, becoming Honduras’s first female president, and Zelaya returned to a prominent political role. The 2009 crisis is widely credited with deepening political polarization and contributing to an exodus of Hondurans fleeing instability and violence — a pattern that would amplify the Central American migration surge visible in subsequent years.

Significance

The 2009 crisis was the first military-backed removal of a sitting Latin American president in years and became a defining test of the OAS’s Inter-American Democratic Charter, which the organization invoked for the first time to suspend a member state over an unconstitutional change of government. It exposed sharp divisions in the hemisphere and in U.S. policy — Washington initially joined the near-universal condemnation of the coup but later recognized the disputed November 2009 election, a stance that put it at odds with many Latin American governments. The episode reshaped Honduran politics for years afterward, deepening polarization between Zelaya’s supporters, later organized into the LIBRE party, and the traditional two-party establishment, and it remains a frequent reference point in debates over the durability of constitutional government in Central America.

Sources