Skip to main content
Settings
Color Mode
Theme Skin
Background

Appearance preferences are saved in this browser only.

Environment
Current Environment Production

Built with JEKYLL_ENV=production. Changes require deployment.

Quick Links
Theme & Build
Jekyll v3.10.0
Last Build Jul 31, 08:24
Page Info
Layout article
Collection posts
Path _posts/people/2009-09-12-norman-borlaug-death-2009.md
URL /people/2009/09/12/norman-borlaug-death-2009/
Date 2009-09-12
Source Code

Set repository: USER/REPO in your _config.yml to enable source-code shortcuts.

Death of Norman Borlaug

Death of Norman Borlaug

People

Key figures: Norman Borlaug; CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center); Rockefeller Foundation; World Food Programme; CGIAR; Sasakawa Africa Association

Summary

Norman Ernest Borlaug died on September 12, 2009, at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, at age 95, after a brief illness attributed to lymphoma (some sources report lymphocytic leukemia combined with complications from his advanced age). He had remained professionally active until weeks before his death, attending meetings of the Sasakawa Africa Association and corresponding with researchers at CIMMYT in Mexico. His wife of 69 years, Margaret Gibson Borlaug, had predeceased him in 2007.

Borlaug was an American agronomist, plant pathologist, and humanitarian, born March 25, 1914, in Cresco, Iowa. He earned his Ph.D. in plant pathology and genetics from the University of Minnesota in 1942. Joining the Rockefeller Foundation’s Cooperative Wheat Research and Production Program in Mexico in 1944, he began the decades of field research that produced the semi-dwarf, high-yield, disease-resistant wheat varieties that became the foundation of the Green Revolution.

His development of semi-dwarf wheat—particularly the “Norin 10” dwarfing gene crossed with high-yield Mexican lines—solved the lodging problem that had long plagued high-fertilizer wheat cultivation: tall wheat fell over before harvest when fed excess nitrogen, wasting the fertilizer advantage. Borlaug’s shorter-stemmed varieties could absorb more nitrogen without lodging, dramatically increasing yields per hectare. He also championed shuttle breeding—growing two generations per year in contrasting climates (winter in Sonora, summer in Toluca)—which dramatically accelerated the selection cycle and produced varieties adapted to a wider range of day-lengths.

His work transformed food production in India and Pakistan in the 1960s. Pakistan achieved wheat self-sufficiency by 1968 and became a net exporter by the early 1970s; India’s wheat production rose from 12.3 million tonnes in 1965 to 20 million tonnes by 1970. He received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 “for his contributions to the world food supply,” one of the few scientists honored with that prize. He also received the Presidential Medal of Freedom (1977) and the Congressional Gold Medal (2007)—becoming one of only seven individuals to receive all three of the United States’ highest civilian honors.

In his later decades, Borlaug shifted focus to Africa. Working through the Sasakawa Africa Association (founded 1986 with Ryoichi Sasakawa) and the Carter Center, he ran demonstration projects in Ethiopia, Sudan, Ghana, and Tanzania that transferred his yield-improvement methods to smallholder farmers. By 2009 those programs had reached 4.5 million farmers across Africa. He remained a vocal advocate for genetically modified (GM) crops as the logical successor to conventional plant breeding, testifying before Congress and speaking at agricultural conferences as recently as 2009.

Legacy and 2009 Context

Borlaug’s death came at a charged moment in global food politics. The 2007–2008 food price crisis—driven by rising oil prices, biofuel demand, drought in Australia, and export restrictions—had spiked commodity prices to multi-decade highs and triggered food riots in more than 30 countries. Although prices had begun falling by September 2009, food security remained at the top of international agendas: the UN FAO Summit on Food Security was scheduled for November 2009 in Rome, and the G8 had pledged $20 billion over three years for agricultural development at its July 2009 L’Aquila summit.

Tributes poured in from heads of state, the Nobel Committee, and agricultural scientists worldwide. U.S. President Barack Obama called Borlaug “an American hero” and noted that “his dedication to feeding the world sustained countless lives.” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon credited Borlaug’s work with saving “the lives of more than one billion people.”

The eulogies also reignited long-standing debates about the Green Revolution’s mixed legacy. Critics—including Vandana Shiva and a cadre of sustainable-agriculture advocates—argued that Borlaug’s high-input model had increased dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, eroded traditional seed diversity, and concentrated land ownership, particularly in South Asia. Defenders countered that without Borlaug’s productivity gains, India and Pakistan would have faced famine in the late 1960s, and that the environmental critique ignores the far greater land area that would have been needed to feed the same population with traditional varieties. Both sides acknowledged that a “Green Revolution for Africa”—replicating yield improvements on that continent’s diverse smallholder farms without creating new dependencies—was the critical unresolved challenge Borlaug had spent his last years trying to address.

Early Career and the Green Revolution

Borlaug’s most transformative work occurred in three phases:

Mexico (1944–1960s): Working with the Mexican government and Rockefeller Foundation, Borlaug’s team developed Mexican wheat varieties adapted to local soils and pests. By 1956, Mexico had achieved wheat self-sufficiency for the first time—a direct result of his program. His varieties eventually spread to 40 countries.

South Asia (1960s): At the invitation of Indian agronomist M.S. Swaminathan, Borlaug personally supervised the introduction of semi-dwarf wheats in India in 1963. Despite a hostile reception from Indian agricultural bureaucrats skeptical of foreign varieties, a 1965 pilot planting of 35 tonnes of Mexican seed on 1,500 test plots proved spectacularly successful. By 1968 India was producing enough surplus wheat to encounter storage problems—a shocking reversal from the famines predicted by Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb (1968).

Africa (1980s–2009): Working through the Sasakawa Africa Association with funding from the Carter Center and Japanese philanthropist Ryoichi Sasakawa, Borlaug adapted yield-improvement methods for Africa’s more fragmented, low-input farming systems. By his death, the program operated in nine African countries and had been credited by researchers with doubling maize yields in Ethiopia demonstration plots.

Influence on Agricultural Policy (2009 and Beyond)

The posthumous Borlaug debate directly shaped the 2009–2010 global agricultural policy environment:

  • The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), founded in 2006 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation, explicitly positioned itself as building on Borlaug’s model. By 2009 AGRA had disbursed $100 million to African agricultural programs.
  • Borlaug’s advocacy for GM crops influenced ongoing WTO disputes over EU restrictions on biotech agriculture, with the U.S. Trade Representative citing his legacy in 2009 trade filings.
  • The World Bank’s 2008 World Development Report (released January 2008 and still widely cited in 2009) called for doubling agricultural investment in developing nations—a call Borlaug had been making for decades.

Significance

Borlaug’s death removed the founding figure of the Green Revolution at a moment when its legacy was both widely credited and sharply contested. His semi-dwarf wheat varieties and the high-yield model they anchored are commonly credited with averting famine in South Asia and with a food-production increase estimated to have sustained on the order of a billion people—the basis for his 1970 Nobel Peace Prize and his standing as one of the most consequential agricultural scientists of the twentieth century. His passing also crystallized the central agricultural debate of 2009: whether the input-intensive model he pioneered could be adapted to sub-Saharan Africa’s smallholder systems without reproducing the environmental and social costs his critics identified. That question shaped the food-security agenda—from the November 2009 FAO summit to the Gates- and Rockefeller-backed AGRA initiative—that his final decades of work in Africa had sought to advance.

Sources

  • Wikipedia — Norman Borlaug: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug
  • Nobel Prize Committee — Nobel Peace Prize 1970 (Norman Borlaug): https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1970/borlaug/
  • CGIAR — The Borlaug Institute: https://www.cgiar.org/
  • New York Times obituary (September 14, 2009): https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/14/us/14borlaug.html
  • Sasakawa Africa Association — Borlaug Program History: https://www.saa-safe.org/
  • World Bank World Development Report 2008 — Agriculture for Development: https://www.worldbank.org/