Skip to main content
Settings
Color Mode
Theme Skin
Background

Appearance preferences are saved in this browser only.

Environment
Current Environment Production

Built with JEKYLL_ENV=production. Changes require deployment.

Quick Links
Theme & Build
Jekyll v3.10.0
Last Build Aug 01, 07:56
Page Info
Layout article
Collection posts
Path _posts/history-politics/2010-03-26-roks-cheonan-sinking.md
URL /news/history-politics/roks-cheonan-sinking/
Date 2010-03-26
Source Code

Set repository: USER/REPO in your _config.yml to enable source-code shortcuts.

Table of Contents

Sinking of ROKS Cheonan

Category: History & Politics

Key figures: Lee Myung-bak (President of South Korea), Kim Jong-il (leader of North Korea), the Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group

Summary

On the night of 26 March 2010, the Cheonan, a Pohang-class corvette of the Republic of Korea Navy (hull number PCC-772) carrying 104 crew, broke apart and sank in the Yellow Sea near Baengnyeong Island, close to the disputed inter-Korean maritime boundary. An explosion near the stern at about 21:22 Korea Standard Time split the ship in two, and it went down within minutes. Fifty-eight sailors were rescued; 46 died, making it one of the deadliest incidents for the South Korean military since the Korean War.

A South Korean-led Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group, which included experts from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Sweden, and Canada, announced its findings on 20 May 2010, concluding that the Cheonan had been sunk by a torpedo fired from a North Korean submarine. Investigators reported that the weapon detonated beneath the hull rather than striking it directly, producing a “bubble jet” shock wave that broke the vessel’s keel. North Korea denied any involvement, and the episode triggered a sharp deterioration in inter-Korean relations that continued through the November 2010 shelling of Yeonpyeong Island.

The investigation and evidence

The multinational investigation team recovered portions of the sea floor and the sunken vessel and, in mid-May 2010, retrieved fragments of a torpedo — including the propulsion section with contra-rotating propellers and a steering mechanism — that matched the specifications of a North Korean-manufactured CHT-02D torpedo marketed for export. Traces of the explosive RDX were detected on recovered debris, and a section of the propulsion unit bore a hand-written Korean marking, “1번” (“No. 1”), consistent with North Korean labeling conventions. The team concluded that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that the torpedo was fired by a North Korean submarine.” A final report affirming the torpedo conclusion followed in September 2010.

The findings were not universally accepted. North Korea rejected the conclusion and offered to send its own inspection team. China declined to endorse the investigation’s attribution, and Russia conducted a separate technical assessment whose results were never publicly released. Some independent analysts questioned aspects of the forensic case, though the official South Korean and allied position remained that a North Korean attack had caused the sinking.

Diplomatic aftermath

President Lee Myung-bak’s government responded by suspending most inter-Korean trade and cooperation under the so-called “May 24 measures,” resuming propaganda broadcasts along the Demilitarized Zone, and seeking international condemnation. In July 2010 the United Nations Security Council issued a presidential statement condemning the attack that sank the Cheonan but — reflecting the positions of China and Russia — did not explicitly name North Korea as the perpetrator. The United States and South Korea conducted joint naval exercises in a show of deterrence.

Tensions escalated further on 23 November 2010, when North Korean artillery shelled Yeonpyeong Island, killing four South Koreans, including two civilians. Together, the Cheonan sinking and the Yeonpyeong bombardment made 2010 one of the most dangerous years on the Korean Peninsula in decades and hardened South Korean public opinion against engagement with the North.

Significance

The loss of the Cheonan was a defining security event of 2010 in East Asia. It demonstrated the persistent risk of lethal confrontation along the contested Northern Limit Line in the Yellow Sea, exposed the limits of the United Nations Security Council when major powers disagreed over attribution, and effectively ended the remaining framework of inter-Korean economic engagement built during the earlier “Sunshine Policy” era. The incident also unfolded during a period of leadership transition in Pyongyang, as Kim Jong-il moved to position his son Kim Jong-un as successor, and it shaped South Korean defense posture and alliance coordination with the United States for years afterward.

Sources