Skip to main content
Settings
Color Mode
Theme Skin
Background

Appearance preferences are saved in this browser only.

Environment
Current Environment Production

Built with JEKYLL_ENV=production. Changes require deployment.

Quick Links
Theme & Build
Jekyll v3.10.0
Last Build Aug 01, 07:56
Page Info
Layout article
Collection posts
Path _posts/society-economics/2010-05-02-european-sovereign-debt-crisis.md
URL /news/society-economics/european-sovereign-debt-crisis/
Date 2010-05-02
Source Code

Set repository: USER/REPO in your _config.yml to enable source-code shortcuts.

European Sovereign Debt Crisis and the First Greek Bailout

Category: Society & Economics

Key figures: George Papandreou (Greek Prime Minister), George Papaconstantinou (Greek Finance Minister), Angela Merkel (German Chancellor), Jean-Claude Trichet (President of the European Central Bank), Dominique Strauss-Kahn (Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund), Olli Rehn (European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs), Jean-Claude Juncker (President of the Eurogroup)

Summary

During 2010 the eurozone entered the acute phase of a sovereign debt crisis that would test the foundations of the European single currency for the rest of the decade. The crisis crystallised in Greece, whose newly elected government revealed in late 2009 that the country’s budget deficit was far larger than previously reported. Locked out of affordable bond-market financing, Greece on 23 April 2010 became the first euro-area member to request an international rescue, and on 2 May 2010 the Eurogroup and the International Monetary Fund agreed a three-year €110 billion loan programme — the first euro-area bailout — in exchange for severe austerity measures.

The Greek rescue did not contain the panic. Fearing that the crisis would spread to other heavily indebted members, European finance ministers met over the weekend of 9–10 May 2010 and assembled a far larger backstop: the temporary European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), with a lending capacity of up to €440 billion, combined with up to €60 billion from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism and up to €250 billion from the IMF, for a headline safety net of €750 billion. The European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the IMF — collectively dubbed the “Troika” — became the joint overseers of the adjustment programmes. By the end of the year the contagion had reached Ireland, which accepted an €85 billion rescue on 28–29 November 2010.

Origins: the Greek deficit revelation

After the October 2009 Greek general election brought George Papandreou’s PASOK government to power, the new administration disclosed that the 2009 budget deficit would reach roughly 12.7 percent of gross domestic product — roughly double the figure the outgoing government had reported — a number subsequently revised upward to about 15.4 percent. Public debt exceeded 120 percent of GDP. The revelations destroyed investor confidence in the reliability of Greek fiscal statistics and triggered a sustained rise in Greek borrowing costs, as the interest-rate spread between Greek and German government bonds widened sharply.

Credit-rating agencies downgraded Greek sovereign debt repeatedly in early 2010. On 27 April 2010 Standard & Poor’s cut Greece’s rating to BB+, or “junk” status, the first time a eurozone member had lost its investment-grade rating, effectively closing the bond markets to Athens and forcing it to seek official assistance.

The first bailout

On 23 April 2010, speaking from the island of Kastellorizo, Prime Minister Papandreou formally requested the activation of an EU–IMF support package. On 2 May 2010 the euro-area member states and the IMF agreed the First Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece: €110 billion over three years, comprising roughly €80 billion in bilateral loans from euro-area governments, pooled and administered by the European Commission, and about €30 billion from the IMF. In return, the Greek parliament adopted a far-reaching austerity package — increases in value-added tax, cuts to public-sector wages and pensions, tax rises, and structural reforms — intended to reduce the deficit below the EU’s 3 percent threshold over several years.

Austerity and social unrest

The austerity conditions provoked widespread anger in Greece. On 5 May 2010 trade unions staged a nationwide general strike, and one of the largest demonstrations in modern Greek history converged on the parliament in Athens. During the protests, assailants threw petrol bombs at a branch of Marfin Egnatia Bank in central Athens; three employees — among them a pregnant woman — died of asphyxiation after being trapped inside. The deaths became one of the defining images of the crisis and underscored the social cost of the adjustment programmes that would recur across the eurozone periphery.

The €750 billion backstop

The Greek package failed to halt market contagion to other vulnerable members, notably Portugal, Spain, and Ireland. Over the weekend of 9–10 May 2010 the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (Ecofin) agreed an emergency stabilisation mechanism. Its centrepiece was the European Financial Stability Facility, a special-purpose vehicle incorporated in Luxembourg and backed by guarantees from euro-area governments, with a lending capacity of up to €440 billion and an initial three-year mandate. The EFSF could be combined with up to €60 billion from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism — funds the European Commission could raise against the EU budget — and up to €250 billion from the IMF, producing a headline figure of €750 billion. In parallel, the European Central Bank launched its Securities Markets Programme to purchase eurozone government bonds on the secondary market, its first major departure from orthodox monetary policy during the crisis.

The European Central Bank’s Role

The European Central Bank’s interventions during 2010 marked the first major departures from the monetary orthodoxy that had governed the ECB since its founding in 1998. Under President Jean-Claude Trichet, the ECB had previously resisted any suggestion that it might purchase sovereign debt, viewing such interventions as fiscal policy beyond its mandate and potentially inflationary. The Greek crisis forced a reconsideration.

On May 10, 2010 — the same weekend the €750 billion backstop was announced — the ECB launched its Securities Markets Programme (SMP), under which it purchased eurozone government bonds on the secondary market to reduce borrowing costs for stressed sovereigns. Between May 2010 and late 2011, the ECB purchased approximately €219 billion in bonds — primarily Greek, Irish, Portuguese, Spanish, and Italian debt — sterilizing each purchase to prevent an expansion of the money supply and maintain the pretense that monetary policy was unchanged. The SMP was controversial within the ECB’s governing council: German Bundesbank President Axel Weber and ECB Chief Economist Jürgen Stark both publicly dissented and eventually resigned over it.

The ECB also maintained exceptionally loose liquidity conditions for eurozone banks through its long-term refinancing operations (LTROs), allowing banks to borrow unlimited amounts from the ECB at the benchmark rate (lowered to 1 percent in May 2009 and held at that level throughout 2010, before two increases in 2011 that were later reversed) for up to twelve months. This provided critical support to banks in Greece, Ireland, and Spain whose access to private funding markets had been severely curtailed. The ECB’s expanded role in 2010 laid the groundwork for Mario Draghi’s far more powerful intervention in July 2012 — when, as the new ECB president, he promised to do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro — and the subsequent Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT) programme that effectively ended the acute phase of the debt crisis.

Contagion: Ireland

The backstop did not end the crisis. Ireland’s banking system, crippled by losses from a collapsed property bubble that the state had guaranteed, drove the country’s deficit to extraordinary levels in 2010. On 28–29 November 2010, Ireland became the second euro-area member to seek a rescue, agreeing an €85 billion programme that combined EU and IMF funds with Ireland’s own reserves. Portugal would follow in 2011, and Greece would require a second programme in 2012, by which time the EFSF was being superseded by the permanent European Stability Mechanism.

Political Repercussions and Rise of Euroskeptic Movements

The austerity-driven social unrest visible in Greece’s May 5, 2010 general strike and the Marfin bank arson foreshadowed a decade of political upheaval across the eurozone periphery. In the immediate aftermath of the 2010 crisis, established centrist parties in Greece, Ireland, Spain, and Portugal experienced historic electoral defeats as voters rejected the “Troika” prescriptions and the political elites who had negotiated them. In Greece, Alexis Tsipras’s far-left Syriza party — a marginal force in 2010 — rose to become the dominant opposition by 2012 and won the 2015 general election on an explicitly anti-austerity platform. In Spain, the indignados movement (May 15 Movement) emerged in 2011, capturing widespread frustration with unemployment (which reached 25 percent by 2013) and giving birth to Podemos, a new left-wing party that won 20 percent of the vote by 2015.

The crisis also fuelled the growth of far-right Euroskeptic movements across northern and southern Europe. In Denmark, the Danish People’s Party surged on anti-immigration and anti-integration platforms; in Hungary and Poland, nationalist governments came to power partly by channeling resentment of the EU’s fiscal and institutional demands. The notion that European integration had enriched elites while impoverishing workers, and that the euro had entrenched this inequality, gained traction across the political spectrum. The 2010 crisis thus set in motion a decade-long erosion of centrist pro-integration consensus that would culminate in Brexit (2016), the election of Trump in the United States, and the broader wave of populism that reshaped Western politics in the mid-to-late 2010s.

Significance

The events of 2010 transformed a national fiscal scandal into a structural crisis of the euro. They exposed a fundamental design flaw in the monetary union: member states shared a single currency and monetary policy but retained independent fiscal policies, with no central mechanism to rescue a member that lost market access. The improvised rescues of 2010 — and the institutions created to deliver them — became the template for the EFSF’s permanent successor, the European Stability Mechanism, established in 2012, and for a decade of debate over fiscal integration, austerity, and the role of the ECB as a lender of last resort. The crisis also entrenched the “Troika” model of conditional lending and reshaped the politics of southern Europe, where austerity programmes fuelled the rise of new political movements throughout the 2010s.

Sources