Skip to main content

Settings

Color Mode

Theme Skin

Background

Appearance preferences are saved in this browser only.

Environment

Current Environment Production

Built with JEKYLL_ENV=production. Changes require deployment.

Quick Links

Theme & Build

Jekyll v3.10.0
Last BuildSep 14, 11:03

Page Info

Layout article
Collection posts
Path _posts/society-economics/2006-05-01-2006-immigration-reform-protests.md
URL /news/society-economics/2006-immigration-reform-protests/
Date 2006-05-01

Source Code

Set repository: USER/REPO in your _config.yml to enable source-code shortcuts.

Table of Contents

The 2006 U.S. immigration-reform protests

Category: Society & Economics
Key figures: F. James Sensenbrenner (U.S. Representative, author of H.R. 4437), Cardinal Roger Mahony (Archbishop of Los Angeles), Eddie “Piolín” Sotelo (Spanish-language radio host)

Summary

The 2006 U.S. immigration-reform protests were a wave of mass demonstrations across the United States between February and May 2006, mobilizing an estimated 3.5 to 5 million people in more than 140 cities — by most accounts the largest coordinated protest movement in American history to that point. The marches were triggered by H.R. 4437, the Border Protection, Anti-terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act, which had passed the House of Representatives on December 16, 2005, by a vote of 239–182.

Predominantly Latino, the protests demanded a path to legalization rather than criminalization, and drew unprecedented support from immigrant communities, the Catholic Church, labor unions, and Spanish-language media. They peaked on May 1, 2006 — dubbed the “Day Without Immigrants” or the “Great American Boycott” — when between 1.6 and 2.2 million people marched and many stayed home from work and school to demonstrate immigrants’ economic weight.

Background: H.R. 4437

Sponsored by Wisconsin Representative F. James Sensenbrenner, H.R. 4437 would have made unlawful presence in the United States a felony (rather than a civil violation), imposed new penalties on anyone who assisted undocumented immigrants — potentially including clergy and aid workers — and mandated hundreds of miles of border fencing. The bill’s felony provision and its criminalization of humanitarian assistance galvanized immigrant communities and religious leaders. Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles publicly vowed that the Church would defy the law, and Spanish-language broadcasters, including radio host Eddie “Piolín” Sotelo and the networks Univision and Telemundo, amplified calls to march.

The marches

The movement built through the spring in a rising sequence of demonstrations:

  • March 10, 2006 — Chicago: roughly 100,000 people (police estimate), the first of the season’s major marches.
  • March 25, 2006 — Los Angeles (“La Gran Marcha”): an official estimate of more than 500,000, with organizers claiming well over a million — the single largest protest of the movement.
  • April 10, 2006 — National Day of Action: coordinated marches in 102 cities, drawing hundreds of thousands, including very large crowds in Dallas, Washington, and New York.
  • May 1, 2006 — “A Day Without Immigrants”: a nationwide strike, boycott, and set of marches involving an estimated 1.6–2.2 million participants, including some 400,000 in Chicago and 400,000 in Los Angeles.

Outcome

The protests helped defeat H.R. 4437: the bill failed to advance in the Senate, and a rival Senate measure offering a path to legalization (S. 2611) never survived conference with the House. No comprehensive immigration overhaul became law in 2006; instead Congress passed the narrower Secure Fence Act, authorizing additional border barriers, which President George W. Bush signed in October 2006.

Immigration remained a charged issue heading into the November 2006 elections. The demonstrations energized both immigrant-advocacy networks and their opponents — the Minuteman Project reported a sharp rise in interest — and the split within the Republican Party over enforcement versus a guest-worker compromise became one of the cross-currents of the 2006 U.S. midterm elections, which returned control of Congress to the Democrats.

Significance

The 2006 marches marked the political coming-of-age of the modern U.S. immigrant-rights movement. They demonstrated an unprecedented capacity for Latino and immigrant communities to mobilize at national scale, converted a technical legislative fight into a mass civic event, and established May 1 as a recurring day of immigrant mobilization in subsequent years. They also foreshadowed the durable stalemate over comprehensive immigration reform: the same alignment of forces that stopped H.R. 4437 could not, over the following two decades, produce a legalization framework, leaving immigration one of the most persistent unresolved questions in American politics.

Sources