Skip to main content
Settings
Color Mode
Theme Skin
Background

Appearance preferences are saved in this browser only.

Environment
Current Environment Production

Built with JEKYLL_ENV=production. Changes require deployment.

Quick Links
Theme & Build
Jekyll v3.10.0
Last Build Jul 30, 08:23
Page Info
Layout article
Collection posts
Path _posts/economics/1778-01-01-continental-dollar-crisis.md
URL /news/economics/continental-dollar-crisis/
Date 1778-01-01
Source Code

Set repository: USER/REPO in your _config.yml to enable source-code shortcuts.

Featured

Continental Dollar Crisis of 1778

Economics & Trade

Key figures: Continental Congress, Robert Morris (Superintendent of Finance), Alexander Hamilton (aide-de-camp to Washington), Silas Deane (envoy to France)

Summary

By the end of 1778, the Continental dollar—the paper currency issued by the Continental Congress to finance the Revolutionary War—had collapsed to between one-fifth and one-seventh of its face value. The currency crisis resulted from multiple compounding factors: unchecked printing of paper money without adequate backing, the absence of federal taxation authority under the Articles of Confederation, lack of coordination between Congress and state governments (which issued their own competing currencies), active counterfeiting by British intelligence operations, and Congress’s inability to retire bills through taxation or bond sales. This monetary breakdown forced the American cause to rely increasingly on foreign loans, particularly from France, whose formal military alliance of February 6, 1778 became the financial lifeline sustaining the revolution.

Origins of the Crisis

The Continental Congress began issuing paper currency in June 1775 to fund the war effort, lacking both the power to tax and adequate specie (gold and silver) reserves. Congress authorized successive emissions throughout 1775–1778, with total issues eventually reaching approximately $241 million in face value by 1779. Each new emission diluted the currency’s purchasing power, as the money supply far outpaced the economy’s productive capacity and any credible promise of redemption.

By design, the Continental currency was backed by a future promise: states were expected to raise taxes, collect the bills, and remit them to Congress for retirement. This mechanism failed almost entirely. States were reluctant to impose unpopular taxes on a population already burdened by wartime hardship, and the decentralized structure of the Articles of Confederation gave Congress no enforcement power. By 1778, the redemption mechanism had effectively collapsed.

British Counterfeiting Operations

The depreciation was compounded by a deliberate British campaign of economic warfare. Under the direction of New York Governor William Tryon, British-controlled printing operations in New York City and London produced large quantities of counterfeit Continental dollars with high fidelity. These forgeries were distributed through Loyalist networks, newspaper advertisements, and even offered freely to citizens willing to carry them into circulation. The campaign was explicitly designed to accelerate the collapse of American confidence in the currency and thereby destabilize the revolutionary government. Period newspapers in Philadelphia and Boston documented the spread of counterfeits, and Congress issued warnings to the public—though with limited effect.

The Crisis of 1778

By 1778, exchange rates had deteriorated sharply. What had traded at roughly 1.25 Continental dollars per silver dollar in early 1777 had fallen to about 5–7 Continental dollars per silver dollar by the end of 1778; in some states the market rate reached 6 to 1 as early as April, when Congress itself first valued a new emission below face value. Soldiers at Valley Forge during the winter of 1777–1778 were paid in Continental dollars that purchased a fraction of what their nominal wage implied. Suppliers and farmers increasingly refused to accept Continental currency or demanded vastly inflated prices, preferring barter, specie, or state-issued bills. This refusal to accept the currency—known as “depreciation by repudiation”—fed a self-reinforcing cycle of loss of confidence.

Congress attempted price controls through the Continental Price Convention of 1777–1778, with regional conventions setting maximum prices for goods. These efforts largely failed; merchants and farmers evaded the controls, and enforcement was impossible without executive authority Congress did not possess.

French Loans and the Alliance

The currency crisis made the Franco-American Alliance financially indispensable as well as strategically vital. France provided not only military forces and naval support but also critical hard-currency loans and subsidies. Between 1778 and 1782, France extended approximately 6 million livres tournois in loans and outright grants that allowed the Continental government to purchase supplies and maintain the war effort despite the worthless domestic currency. Without this lifeline, the collapse of the Continental dollar in 1778 might well have forced a negotiated peace on British terms.

Benjamin Franklin, as Minister to France, was instrumental in securing these funds. His diplomatic success in Paris—culminating in the treaties of February 6, 1778—was thus not merely a political achievement but an economic rescue. Franklin’s negotiations with the French court, conducted chiefly through foreign minister the Comte de Vergennes, transformed American survival from a military question into a financial one tied to European great-power politics.

Impact on Trade and Commerce

The currency depreciation reshaped American wartime commerce profoundly. Merchants engaged in privateering—seizing British merchant vessels—partly because prize goods could be sold for hard currency or traded directly, bypassing the depreciating dollar entirely. The Battle of Ushant in July 1778 demonstrated that France’s naval power could offer some protection to transatlantic trade lanes, giving merchants a more credible avenue for commerce with French-controlled ports.

Price Effects: Inflation in Everyday Terms

The abstract exchange rates of the Continental dollar crisis translated into stark hardship for ordinary Americans. Contemporary price records from Pennsylvania and Massachusetts document the scale:

Commodity 1775–1776 price (Continental dollars) 1778 price (Continental dollars) Approximate depreciation
Barrel of flour ~$6 $30–45 5–7.5×
Pound of beef $0.05 $0.30–0.50 6–10×
Cord of firewood $1.25 ~$10
Pair of shoes $2 $25 12.5×
Day’s common labor $0.75 nominal $2–3 nominal real purchasing power fell ~70–80%

These figures, drawn from the records of the Pennsylvania Price Convention and surviving Philadelphia merchant account books, show basic necessities becoming inaccessible to wage-earners whose nominal pay increased far more slowly than prices. A Continental soldier earning the nominal pay of $6.67 per month received roughly $1 in real purchasing power compared to equivalent pay in hard currency — a disparity that drove the reluctance of farmers and suppliers to accept Continental bills.

Geographic Variation

The depreciation was not uniform. States with stronger commercial networks and more active specie circulation maintained somewhat better exchange rates. Pennsylvania’s Quaker merchant community’s preference for hard-currency transactions and Philadelphia’s role as a commercial center kept some hard money in circulation; Massachusetts merchants engaged in privateering and trade with French Caribbean ports accessed prize cargoes that could be sold for specie. Southern colonies, particularly South Carolina, where rice exports to French islands provided some hard-currency income, maintained relative cushions. These geographic disparities meant Continental soldiers stationed in different regions received effectively different real wages for identical nominal pay — a source of grievance that undermined inter-unit morale and made coordinated operations across state lines more difficult.

Political Consequences Within States

The currency collapse created new political alignments within the states. Creditors who had lent in specie saw their debts repaid in depreciated paper, redistributing wealth from lenders to debtors in ways that fueled class tensions. Merchants who had accepted Continental dollars at face value early in the war found themselves holding nearly worthless paper. These grievances, unresolved by the war’s end, fed the political tensions of the 1780s: Massachusetts’s Shays’ Rebellion (1786–1787) was partly rooted in the hardships of debtors — many of them Revolutionary War veterans — who had been paid in depreciated currency and then faced post-war tax demands payable in hard money.

Legacy

The Continental dollar crisis left lasting marks on American political and financial thought. The experience drove the constitutional framers at Philadelphia in 1787 to deny states the power to issue paper currency (Article I, Section 10) and to give Congress explicit power to coin money and regulate its value. The hard-money provisions of the Constitution were, in significant part, a direct response to the memory of 1778. Robert Morris, appointed Superintendent of Finance in 1781, would attempt to reconstruct American credit through the Bank of North America, drawing directly on the lessons of the Continental dollar’s failure.

The phrase “not worth a continental” entered American vernacular as a lasting expression of worthlessness, testifying to the cultural depth of this economic failure well beyond the Revolutionary generation.

See Also

Sources